Cycles of concentration (CoC) is the ratio of dissolved mineral content in a cooling tower's recirculating water to that of the incoming makeup water. It measures how many times those minerals have concentrated as water evaporates, and it is the key metric for balancing water savings against the risk of scale and corrosion.
No matter the industry, metrics are the things by which you can quantifiably measure all aspects of your operation ... and for the cooling tower water treatment industry, cycles of concentration is one of the most important top-line numbers you can monitor.
With some basic measurements and calculations, the cycles of concentration figure can tell you a lot about how a cooling tower is operating, including the external conditions under which it is operating. (Elsewhere, we summarized some other key terms and metrics for the cooling tower water treatment industry.)
Basically, it's really important, like a baseball player's batting average or a quarterback's completion percentage.
But like all numbers, there's a story beneath the numbers that has to be understood before we even know what to think about cycles of concentration and what might be an appropriate number.
Cycles of concentration (often abbreviated as COC) describe the ratio of dissolved minerals and solids in a cooling tower’s circulating water compared to the make-up water. As water evaporates from a cooling tower, it leaves behind minerals such as calcium, magnesium, chlorides, and sulfates. These accumulate in the remaining water, increasing its concentration.
The cycles of concentration provide a simple way to measure and manage this buildup. For example, if the circulating water contains four times as many dissolved solids as the fresh make-up water, the system is operating at four cycles of concentration.
Maintaining proper cycles of concentration is critical. Too few cycles waste water and increase operating costs, while too many cycles cause scaling, corrosion, and fouling of equipment.
For example, some cooling towers, which might be located in parts of the world facing more acute water scarcity, might tend toward an elevated cycles of concentration figure in order to reduce water consumption. One study of a cooling tower servicing a power plant operation found that increasing cycles of concentration from 6.5 to 9 led to water savings of 1.1 × 106 m3 per year while accomplishing the same level of cooling.1
However, as a result, these types of sites might need more aggressive strategies to get ahead of corrosion, scale and microbial growth, which greatly impact the heat transfer capabilities of the cooling tower.
Many cooling towers operate at much lower cycles of concentration than the aforementioned example. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, many cooling towers operate from 2-4 cycles of concentration. Increasing cycles of concentration from three to six reduces makeup water consumption by 20% and blowdown by 50%, the DOE notes on its website.
Cycles of concentration are most reliably calculated by comparing the chloride level in the recirculating water to the chloride level in the makeup water: cycles of concentration equal chloride in the recirculating water divided by chloride in the makeup water.
Chloride is the preferred tracer because it is highly soluble and is not removed by scaling or by most treatment chemistry, so it gives an accurate reading of how concentrated the water has become. Conductivity meters offer a faster daily proxy, but they should be calibrated against the chloride ratio to stay accurate.
Some concepts to know when thinking about cycles of concentration:
Cycles = (Circulating Water Conductivity ÷ Make-up Water Conductivity)
This method is fast and cost-effective since conductivity meters are widely available.
Cycles = (Chloride in Circulating Water ÷ Chloride in Make-up Water)
Chloride ratio is another method by which to calculate your COC.
In some regions, silica or calcium hardness is used instead of chloride, depending on local water chemistry.
No matter which method is chosen, consistency is key. Many facilities rely on automated controllers that monitor conductivity in real time and adjust blowdown accordingly.
We always say every cooling tower is different. There are a number of variables that contribute to determining the what you should target for your site's cycles of concentration regimen.
Just like you might change how you deliver personal advice to person A versus person B, advice related to cycles of concentration comes with one main caveat: you need to do what produces the best outcomes for your site based on its unique conditions.
With that in mind, it's important to do the necessary homework for your operation. Making the most accurate determination can mean cost savings and better performance.
The “ideal” cycles of concentration vary based on water quality, tower design, and treatment programs. Setting the right balance is essential for maximizing efficiency while protecting equipment.
With that said, there is no universal "ideal" number of cycles of concentration.
Federal guidance from the U.S. Department of Energy notes that many cooling towers operate at two to four cycles, while six or more can be achievable, and that raising cycles from three to six can reduce makeup water use by about 20 percent and blowdown by roughly 50 percent. In other words, operators can often see diminishing returns past 6 cycles.
For scale, a cooling tower operating at five cycles uses about 40 times less water for the same heat load than a single-pass system. The largest savings come at the lower end of the range and taper off as cycles climb, while the risk of scale and corrosion steadily rises, so pushing cycles ever higher delivers diminishing returns.
The right target for any given tower is highly site-specific. It depends on makeup water availability and cost, the facility's sustainability and water-reduction goals, and the system's own profile, including makeup water chemistry and scaling tendency (commonly assessed with the Langelier Saturation Index), materials of construction, heat load, and the capabilities of the treatment program. Because driving cycles too high can precipitate dissolved solids and damage equipment, the optimal figure should be established and monitored with a qualified water treatment specialist.
To mock up some scenarios using your site's parameters, use our cooling tower program calculator, which includes a field for cycles of concentration.
Every cooling tower system has maximum allowable levels of calcium, silica, alkalinity, and chlorides before scaling, fouling, or corrosion becomes a risk. Water treatment vendors typically run detailed analyses and set upper limits tailored to the site.
Higher cycles of concentration reduce blowdown frequency, which saves water and decreases sewer discharge costs. However, pushing cycles too high without proper control can lead to scaling that reduces heat transfer efficiency.
The chemicals used for scale and corrosion control, such as phosphonates or polymer dispersants, directly influence the achievable cycles. A robust water treatment program can safely extend the cycles, depending on water quality.
Local discharge permits may restrict certain parameters, such as chlorides or total dissolved solids (TDS), limiting how high the cycles can be set. Whatever the case may be, you need to be aware of those requirements and have them in mind when assessing your treatment regimen (i.e., deciding if you want to increase or decrease cycles of concentration).
Regular testing and automated conductivity controllers make it easier to safely operate at higher cycles without risking equipment damage. Data is the the common thread in all of this: you can't assess what you don't measure. Having this historical data on hand helps you make more informed decisions about your cooling tower water treatment plan.
Optimizing cycles of concentration is about balance. Operating too low wastes water and money, while operating too high risks scale, corrosion, and equipment downtime.
By carefully analyzing make-up water quality, monitoring key parameters, and working with a qualified water treatment specialist, facilities can determine the ideal cycles of concentration for their cooling tower.
When optimized, proper cycles of concentration lead to lower water consumption, reduced chemical use, improved energy efficiency, and longer equipment life. All of that contributes to more sustainable and more cost-effective cooling tower operation.
Just like a seesaw, it can take some time to calibrate its operation in a way that makes sense. A cooling tower is no different in that way: it's all about balance and striving to find it.
The Smart Release Technology team has decades of experience in helping cooling tower operators achieve simple, safer, reliable water treatment processes in their cooling towers. Reach out to learn more about how Smart Release Technology equipment and solid chemicals can help you achieve the perfect cycles of concentration balance for your site.